Option A

Aerobic Exercise

The heart-first approach to long-term vitality.

Best for: Men prioritizing cardiovascular health, endurance, and metabolic risk reduction.

Option B

Strength Training

The muscle-preserving strategy for ageing well.

Best for: Men focused on maintaining muscle mass, bone density, and hormonal health as they age.

Cardiovascular Health: Where Aerobic Exercise Has the Edge

For men concerned about heart disease — the leading cause of death among American men — aerobic exercise has a well-established advantage. Activities such as brisk walking, running, cycling, and swimming strengthen the heart muscle, lower resting blood pressure, raise HDL ("good") cholesterol, and reduce resting heart rate over time. Research consistently links regular moderate-to-vigorous cardio with meaningful reductions in cardiovascular mortality risk.

Strength training does benefit the heart too — it can modestly lower blood pressure and improve cholesterol — but the depth of cardiovascular evidence for aerobic exercise is considerably greater. For men with existing metabolic risk factors, cardio remains the front-line exercise recommendation from most major health organizations.

CriterionAerobic ExerciseStrength Training
Cardiovascular benefit Very strong evidence Moderate evidence
Muscle mass preservation Minimal direct effect Primary benefit
Bone density support Moderate (weight-bearing types) Strong direct effect
Calorie burn per session Generally higher Generally lower
Resting metabolic rate Limited long-term impact Increased via muscle gain
Mood and mental health Well-established benefits Well-established benefits
Testosterone support Neutral to modest Modest short-term boost
All-cause mortality reduction Strong evidence Strong evidence

Muscle, Bone, and the Ageing Body

Men begin losing muscle mass — a process called sarcopenia — gradually from around their mid-30s, with the rate accelerating after 60. This loss affects strength, balance, and metabolic rate. Bone density also declines with age, raising fracture risk. Strength training is the most effective exercise intervention for countering both. Progressive resistance work stimulates muscle protein synthesis and places mechanical stress on bones, signaling them to maintain or increase density.

Aerobic exercise offers modest musculoskeletal benefits — weight-bearing cardio like walking or jogging does support bone health — but it cannot replicate the targeted structural benefits of lifting weights or resistance-based movement. Men who want to maintain functional independence into their later decades would benefit from making resistance training a consistent part of their routine. This is especially relevant in the context of habits that quietly undermine men's health over decades, such as prolonged sitting and a sedentary lifestyle.

~3–8%

Muscle mass lost per decade after age 30

The American College of Sports Medicine notes sarcopenia accelerates without regular resistance training as men age.

35%

Lower cardiovascular mortality risk

A large meta-analysis in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found men with high cardiorespiratory fitness had substantially reduced cardiovascular death risk.

2–3×

Weekly exercise sessions recommended

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity and two days of muscle-strengthening per week for adults.

Metabolism, Hormones, and Body Composition

Both exercise types influence metabolism, but through different mechanisms. Aerobic exercise burns more calories per session and improves the body's ability to use oxygen efficiently. Strength training, however, increases lean muscle mass, which raises resting metabolic rate — meaning the body burns more energy even at rest. This gives resistance training a longer-term metabolic advantage for men managing weight or blood sugar.

Hormonal effects are also worth noting. Both forms of exercise can support healthy testosterone levels, though the relationship is complex. Intense resistance training tends to produce short-term testosterone spikes, while chronic endurance training at very high volumes has been associated in some research with suppressed hormone levels. For a fuller picture of how exercise interacts with hormonal health, see our article on what testosterone actually does and when levels matter.

Mental Health, Sleep, and Stress

Both aerobic and strength training offer meaningful mental health benefits. Cardio exercise is particularly well-studied for its mood-lifting effects — it promotes the release of endorphins and increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein associated with cognitive function and resilience to depression. Resistance training has also shown consistent benefits for anxiety, self-esteem, and cognitive performance in men.

Exercise quality intersects closely with sleep quality, and both forms of training can help regulate sleep architecture. Poor sleep, in turn, undermines recovery and hormonal health — a dynamic explored in depth in our piece on sleep and men's health. Men managing chronic stress may also find that structured exercise — regardless of type — is one of the more evidence-backed tools available, as discussed in our article on stress management approaches backed by evidence.

You Don't Have to Choose One

The U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommend both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity each week — not as alternatives, but as complements. Research on concurrent training (combining both in a weekly routine) consistently shows that men doing both achieve better overall health outcomes than those doing either alone. Even modest amounts of each type provide measurable benefit over a sedentary lifestyle.

This article is for general informational purposes only and is not a substitute for personalized medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting or significantly changing an exercise program, especially if you have existing health conditions.

Share

Health & Wellness Editorial Team · Contributor

Health & Wellness Editorial Team is the collective byline for our editorial team and contributor network. Articles published under this byline or an editorial pen name are researched, written, and reviewed according to our editorial standards for clarity, consistency, and independence before publication.

The content on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Always consult a qualified professional for guidance specific to your situation.